Adulteration of Botanical Raw
Materials in India, Part 2: identity Determination of 112 Commercial Herbal Raw
Materials Using DNA Barcoding
Reviewed: Stalin N, Vassou SL, Sundar
P, Raju B, Madasamy P. Identification of species adulteration
in traded medicinal plant raw drugs using DNA barcoding. Genome.
2016;60(2):139-146.
Keywords: Medicinal plant, India, adulteration, DNA barcoding
This
investigation into the authenticity of crude raw materials sold in India also
used a DNA barcoding approach. The authors created their own DNA sequence library using 521
taxonomically authenticated medicinal plant species. The choice of the two
genetic regions used for sequencing, matK and rbcL, was based on recommendations by the Consortium for the
Barcode of Life Plant Working Group (CBoL). Commercial samples (n = 112) were
collected from eight markets in the Indian province of Tamil Nadu using Tamil
vernacular names.
DNA sequences for the rbcL
locus were obtained for all 112 samples; however, the success rate was only 64%
using the matK gene region. The yield of
full-length sequences was 94% and 47% for rbcL and matK, respectively. Species identification of the raw drugs
was performed by the best match method using Taxon DNA software, which assigns
the sequence of interest to its closest match based on the genetic divergence.
The results indicate that 22 commercial raw
materials were completely substituted by a species from a different genus or
family. Andrographis paniculata (Acanthaceae) or
Senna species (Fabaceae) were each
identified as adulterants in three commercial products. Reasons for the
adulteration may include accidental or intentional mislabeling, similar
morphology, occurrence in the same habitat, confusion in vernacular names, or
substitution as result of non-availability or high cost of the authentic
species. The problems in using the common names were exemplified by four cases
(Table 1).
Table 1. Examples of species adulteration
in India due to confusing vernacular names
Labeled species
|
Vernacular name
|
Adulterant species
|
Vernacular name
|
Bergenia ciliata
(Saxifragaceae)
|
Sirupilai
|
Aerva lanata (Amaranthaceae)
|
Sirupilai
|
Swertia chirata (Gentianaceae)
|
Nilavembu
|
Andrographis paniculata (Acanthaceae)
|
Nilavembu
|
Adenanthera
pavonina (Fabaceae)
|
Anai Kundumani
|
Abrus precatorius (Fabaceae)
|
Kundumani
|
Toona ciliata (Meliaceae)
|
Santhana Vembu
|
Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae)
|
Vembu
|
Comment: The determination of the identity
of raw materials used in herbal medicine systems in India continues to be a
focus of academic institutions on the Indian subcontinent. The use of genetic
methods to authenticate crude raw materials is becoming more prominent, and
plant geneticists, such as the authors of this paper, suggest that the approach
should be included as part of the toolbox of regulatory agencies. However,
exactly which method is best suited for general use, and how to determine the
validity of the method, are a matter of debate, as evidenced in discussions
during a recent roundtable discussion organized by the United States
Pharmacopeia.1 One major hurdle is the establishment of a database
containing sequence data obtained from taxonomically verified voucher specimen,
which will require collaboration of a number of organizations on a global
scale. As an example, the barcode library created by the authors of this paper,
which contains rbcL and matK
sequences of 521 plant species, contains less than 10% of the estimated 7500
medicinal plant species used in India.2
References
1.
USP Roundtable
Summary - DNA Methods for the Identification of Botanical Articles. Rockville,
MD: United States Pharmacopeial Convention. August 2016. Available at: http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/dietarySupp/newsletter/201608-dna-summary.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2017.
2.
Uniyal RC, Uniyal MR, Jain P. Cultivation of Medicinal Plants in India: A Reference
Book. New Delhi, India: TRAFFIC India. 2000.