Analysis of the Maca Metabolome by NMR to Detect
Adulteration
Reviewed: Zhao J, Wang M, Khan IA. Detection
of adulteration in dietary supplements: maca (Lepidium meyenii) case
study by NMR approach. Poster presentation PG12 at: American Society of
Pharmacognosy Annual Meeting; July 26, 2015; Copper Mountain, CO.
This poster presented
an NMR-based approach to evaluate authentic maca (Lepidium meyenii,
Brassicaceae) root, maca leaf, and 32 single-ingredient commercial maca
products. The samples (200 mg) were extracted in 400 µL of deuterated methanol,
sonicated, centrifuged, and the supernatant used for the NMR analysis.
Metabolite profiles were submitted to statistical evaluation by principal
component analysis (PCA), which was presented in a scatterplot of 31 authentic
and 28 commercial samples. There was no clear clustering of authentic and
commercial samples, indicating important differences in the chemical
composition within samples of authentic maca and within the maca products. The
authors used the presence of the signal at 4.32 ppm (using CD3OD),
characteristic of macamides, as an indicator of authentic maca. Based on the
absence of this NMR signal in a number of samples, they concluded that some
(the actual number is not specified in the poster) of the commercial products
were adulterated.
Comment: The main advantages of this method,
according to the authors, are the short sample preparation time and the lack of
a need for commercial maca standard compounds. The metabolomics approach also
allows analysts to look at all the methanol-soluble components in maca rather
than focusing on one or two classes of compounds. Since the macamides are
components that are characteristic for L. meyenii, they represent good
marker compounds for authentication of whole, cut, or powdered maca hypocotyls.
HPLC-UV-based methods to quantify macamides have been described earlier1,2
and provide an alternative to the presented NMR study. However, the reliance on
macamides to authenticate maca in commercial products, in particular for
extracts made using an unknown manufacturing process, carries the risk that
these products may be erroneously considered adulterated, since macamides are
highly lipophilic and may not be present depending on the extraction process.
Anticipating that these preliminary
results will be followed by a more in-depth publication, it will be interesting
to see just how many samples were analyzed, what the extent of maca
adulteration in the study is, and if the authors will be able to identify the
adulterants in those products allegedly mislabeled as containing maca root as
the single ingredient.
References
1.
Ganzera M, Zhao J,
Muhammad I, Khan IA. Chemical profiling and standardization of Lepidium meyenii (maca) by reversed phase high performance
liquid chromatography. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo).
2002;50(7):988-991.
2. McCollom MM,
Villinski JR, McPhail KL, Craker LE, Gafner S. Analysis of macamides in samples
of maca (Lepidium meyenii) by HPLC-UV-MS/MS. Phytochem Anal. 2005;16(6):463-469.