In
the past year, much has changed for Jonnie R. Williams Sr. and his dietary
supplement company, Star Scientific, Inc. In December 2013, the US Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) sent a warning letter to Williams notifying him that
two of his company’s products — Anatabloc® and CigRx® —
did not meet the legal definition of a dietary supplement and were therefore
adulterated under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.1 Both
products contain anatabine, a minor alkaloid present in small quantities in
tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum) and
certain other plants (see Table 1), which the company promotes for its
anti-inflammatory properties and smoking cessation benefits.2
Shortly thereafter, Williams stepped down as the CEO of Star Scientific, and by
mid-2014 the company had rebranded itself as Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and moved its headquarters from Glen Allen, Virginia to Sarasota, Florida.3
In
January 2014, less than a month after Williams resigned as CEO of the company
he founded, Robert McDonnell, the former Republican governor of Virginia, and
his wife, Maureen, were indicted on 14 criminal counts of corruption, filed in
the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.4 The
McDonnells were charged with accepting more than $177,000 in loans and gifts
from Williams in exchange for official acts performed by governor and his
office to promote Star Scientific products such as Anatabloc.5
Williams — the prosecution’s key witness — agreed to testify “in exchange for
an extraordinary, rarely granted form of immunity.”3
The
McDonnells’ corruption trial began in late July 2014 and has been the focus of
much media attention.5 On August 11, two weeks after the trial began,
Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals announced in its quarterly report to the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) that it was voluntarily halting sales of
Anatabloc and CigRx, citing changing priorities for the company.6
“This action was taken in connection with an ongoing review of the
extent to which our dietary supplement business … will impact our primary focus
of developing pharmaceutical products from our anatabine-based compounds,” Rock
Creek stated in the report.6 “[W]e anticipate that this will
bring the FDA warning letter matter to a close.”
The legal matters of Bob and Maureen McDonnell are ongoing. On
September 4, 2014, the former governor was found guilty of 11 corruption-related
charges — including conspiracy, bribery, and extortion — and his wife was convicted
on nine counts. A judge has scheduled sentencing for January 6, 2015; the
McDonnells’ legal team has vowed to appeal the jury’s decision.7
Tobacco for Health:
A Brief History of Star Scientific
Williams, an entrepreneur and businessman,
dabbled in a number of different ventures in the 1980s including car sales and
optometry-related startups. In 1990, Williams founded Star Tobacco with the
goal of making “safer” tobacco.8
“I don’t like tobacco,” Williams was quoted as
saying in a Richmond Times-Dispatch
article from 1988. “I am more interested in health care.”9
Star Scientific introduced smokeless tobacco
products in the 1990s, and Williams eventually patented a tobacco-curing
process involving microwave radiation, which greatly reduced the amount of
tobacco-specific nitrosamines, a group of potent carcinogens, in the dried plant
material. In the late ’90s, the company significantly reduced the scope of its
cigarette manufacturing operations, and Williams was appointed CEO of the newly
renamed Star Scientific in 1999.9,10
“For most of its history as a maker of
cigarettes, then smokeless tobacco, Star Scientific has presented itself as an
innovator, seeking to bring change to an industry that for decades resisted it,”
commented the author of a 2014 article in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.10
In
a span of roughly two decades, Star Scientific transformed from a cigarette
manufacturer to a “technology-oriented company” concentrating on the
nicotine-like chemical anatabine. The company’s new health-focused goal,
according to Star Scientific, is “to develop a range of non-nicotine dietary
supplements and related pharmaceutical products that could be beneficial in
maintaining a healthy metabolism and in supporting good nutrition.”11
Table 1. Claimed Natural
Sources of Anatabine*
|
|
Reference
|
Anatabine exists in tobacco and certain foods [in the
nightshade family, Solanaceae], including green tomatoes [Solanum lycopersicum], green potatoes [Solanum tuberosum], ripe
red peppers [Capsicum annuum], tomatillos [Physalis philadelphica], and sundried
tomatoes [Solanum lycopersicum].
|
12
|
As an alternative to preparing anatabine synthetically,
anatabine can be obtained by extraction from tobacco or other plants, such as members
of [Solanaceae], e.g., jimson weed
[Datura spp.], mandrake [Mandragora officinalis], belladonna [Atropa belladonna], [chili peppers (Capsicum spp.)], potato, … eggplant [Solanum melongena], and petunia [Petunia spp.].
|
12
|
Although
anatabine is present as an inherent constituent of foods such as cauliflower [Brassica oleraceae],
eggplant, potatoes, and tomatoes,
FDA is not aware of any information indicating that anatabine itself is an
article used for food.
|
1
|
Corkwood (Duboisia myoporoides)
Tobacco
|
13
|
*References 1 and 12 do not include primary
scientific data supporting anatabine’s presence in the plants listed.
On August 5, 2010, Star Scientific launched CigRx,
a dissolvable smoking cessation lozenge that contains anatabine and yerba maté
(Ilex paraguariensis)
as its active ingredients.14 One year later, the company
introduced the dietary supplement Anatabloc, which retailed for $99.99 for a
30-day supply.2 According to its online description, “Anatabloc® leverages the body’s natural process for
regulating its own inflammation using anatabine, a naturally-occurring compound
found in some plants, combined with Vitamin A and D3.”2 A
$300-per-jar facial cream was added to the product line in 2012, promoted as
being “infused with anatabine citrate, a rare ingredient that is exclusive to
Anatabloc.”15
In December 2012, Star Scientific announced that it would focus on dietary supplements,
officially severing ties with the tobacco industry. Despite Star Scientific’s
revamped mission and new products, the company has reported 11 consecutive
years of financial losses through 2013, according the most recent SEC report
available.6
“Our future prospects,” Star Scientific notes in
the report, “therefore are dependent on the expanded distribution and consumer
acceptance of our dietary supplement products and cosmetic product.”6
McDonnells Indicted
and Convicted of Corruption
Williams
allegedly first became acquainted with Bob McDonnell during his 2009
gubernatorial race. According to the indictment filed in US District Court,
McDonnell’s staff requested the use of Williams’ private jet for campaigning
purposes. Shortly after McDonnell was elected Governor of Virginia in November
2009, Williams asked to meet with the McDonnells at a political event in New
York City, and they remained in varying degrees of contact through March 2013.4
The
federal indictment charges that over a period of roughly two years, the
McDonnells schemed to provide “official actions … to legitimize, promote, and
obtain research studies for Star Scientific’s products, including Anatabloc®” in
exchange for loans and gifts from Williams, reportedly totaling more than
$177,000.4,5
McDonnell
— whose campaign slogan was “Bob’s for Jobs” — maintains that any actions he
took to support Williams and/or Star Scientific were consistent with his goal
to promote Virginia businesses.16
The
43-page indictment provides numerous examples of such “official actions”
performed by McDonnell, including the following:
“i. arranging meetings for [Williams]
with Virginia government officials, who were subordinates of the Governor, to
discuss and promote Anatabloc®;
“ii. hosting, and the defendants
attending, events at the Governor's Mansion designed to encourage Virginia
university researchers to initiate studies of anatabine and to promote Star
Scientific's products to [medical] doctors for referral to their patients;
“iii. contacting other government
officials in the OGV [Office of the Governor of Virginia] as part of an effort
to encourage Virginia state research universities to initiate studies of
anatabine;
“iv. promoting Star Scientific's
products and facilitating its relationships with Virginia government officials
by allowing [Williams] to invite individuals important to Star Scientific's
business to exclusive events at the Governor's Mansion; and
“v. recommending that senior government
officials in the OGV meet with Star Scientific executives to discuss ways that
the company's products could lower healthcare costs.”4
Maureen
McDonnell, who — according to her daughter’s court testimony — had a “mild
obsession” with Williams, also was allegedly involved in promoting Anatabloc in
return for luxury gifts, including designer clothes, shoes, and a $6,500 Rolex
for her husband.4 At a campaign event for Mitt Romney in 2012,
Maureen — who was “particularly enthusiastic” about Anatabloc — reportedly
suggested to Ann Romney that the supplement “could potentially cure [her]
multiple sclerosis.”18
Legal and Regulatory Concerns
On December 20, 2013, anatabine became the latest dietary supplement ingredient
with claimed botanical origins to receive a warning letter from the FDA.
However, in contrast with recent FDA actions against supplements containing
controversial ingredients claimed to be of plant origin — i.e., DMAA (1,3-dimethylamylamine) and dendrobium (Dendrobium nobile, Orchidaceae)
extract — the FDA did not comment on the natural or synthetic source of
anatabine in Star Scientific’s products. Instead, the agency focused on the
product’s illegal therapeutic claims and brought up both anatabine’s New
Dietary Ingredient (NDI) and Investigational New Drug (IND) status.1
Therapeutic/Drug
Claims
According
to the FDA’s warning letter, Star Scientific’s website “promotes the product
Anatabloc for conditions that cause the product to be a drug under section
201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.”1
In
the “Health Research” section of its website — which has since been taken down
— Star Scientific cited studies that suggest anatabine may be helpful in
treating multiple sclerosis, mitigating “neuro-inflammatory conditions,”
preventing ulcerative colitis, treating Alzheimer’s disease, and “alleviat[ing]
the negative consequences of traumatic brain injury.”1
At
the time of this writing (August 2014), only two randomized, controlled human
clinical trials have been published on anatabine. The first study, published in July 2013, found
no benefit of anatabine over placebo in muscle damage indicators or strength
recovery in 18 men after strenuous workouts.19 The second study,
published a few months later, examined the effects of anatabine in 146 participants
with Hashimoto’s disease,20 a condition otherwise known as chronic
lymphocytic thyroiditis.21 The authors found that anatabine had an
impact on the levels of one thyroid antibody and recommended further study. (Both
studies were funded by Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals and included company
employees as authors.)
Star
Scientific noted in its annual SEC filing dated March 17, 2014 that it was
taking steps to address some of the concerns in the warning letter. "In light of our receipt of
the FDA letter, we have substantially limited the marketing and advertising of
our dietary supplements," the company noted.11
Table 2. Relevant
Sections of the US Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act21*
|
Section
|
Topic
|
Language
|
201(g)(1)(B)
|
Definition of a
drug
|
The term “drug”
means… articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment,
or prevention of disease in man or other animals.
|
201(ff)(1)
|
Definition of a
dietary supplement
|
The term “dietary supplement” … means a product (other than tobacco [emphasis added])
intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of the
following dietary ingredients: (A) a vitamin; (B) a mineral; (C) an herb or
other botanical; (D) an amino acid; (E) a dietary substance for use by man to
supplement the diet by increasing the total dietary intake; or (F) a
concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract, or combination of any
ingredient described in clause (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E).
|
201(ff)(3)(B)(ii)
|
Dietary
supplements and INDs
|
The term “dietary supplement”… does… not include… an article authorized for investigation as a new drug,
antibiotic, or biological for which substantial clinical investigations have
been instituted and for which the existence of such investigations has been
made public, which was not before such approval, certification, licensing, or
authorization marketed as a dietary supplement or as a food unless the
Secretary, in the Secretary's discretion, has issued a regulation, after
notice and comment, finding that the article would be lawful under this
chapter.
|
350b(d)
|
Definition of a
new dietary ingredient
|
For purposes of
this section, the term “new dietary ingredient” means a dietary ingredient
that was not marketed in the United States before October 15, 1994 and does
not include any dietary ingredient which was marketed in the United States
before October 15, 1994.
|
413(a)(1) and (2)
|
Dietary supplement
adulteration
|
A
dietary supplement which contains a new dietary ingredient shall be deemed
adulterated under section 402(f) unless it meets one of the following
requirements:
(1) The
dietary supplement contains only dietary ingredients which have been present
in the food supply as an article used for food in a form in which the food
has not been chemically altered.
(2)
There is a history of use or other evidence of safety establishing that the
dietary ingredient when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in
the labeling of the dietary supplement will reasonably be expected to be safe
and, at least 75 days before being introduced or delivered for introduction
into interstate commerce, the manufacturer or distributor of the dietary
ingredient or dietary supplement provides the Secretary with information,
including any citation to published articles, which is the basis on which the
manufacturer or distributor has concluded that a dietary supplement
containing such dietary ingredient will reasonably be expected to be safe.
|
*As amended by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) of 1994.
INDs
& NDIs
According
to the FDA’s warning letter, anatabine was authorized as an investigational new
drug (IND) on June 8, 2012.1 (One peer reviewer of this article
familiar with the case, however, claims that the company did not submit an IND application
in 2012. In its August 2014 quarterly SEC filing, Star Scientific writes: “We filed
an IND application in June 2014, however, the FDA has issued a clinical hold on
the application, pending clarification of data from 2010.”6)
As
the FDA explains online, “the investigational new drug
(IND) application is the result of a successful preclinical development program,”
which is designed “to determine if the product is reasonably safe for initial
use in humans.”22 Importantly, the FDA continues, an “IND is not
an application for marketing approval. Rather, it is a request for an exemption
from the Federal [statute] that prohibits an unapproved drug from being shipped
in interstate commerce.”22
Anatabine’s
IND authorization, as detailed in the December 20 warning letter, thus complicates
Anatabloc’s classification as a dietary supplement.
“Under
section 201(ff)(3)(B)(ii) of the [Food, Drug and Cosmetic] Act,” the FDA
writes, “a dietary supplement may not include an article authorized for investigation
as a new drug for which substantial clinical investigations have been
instituted and made public, unless the article was marketed as a dietary
supplement or food before its investigation was authorized.”1
Star
Scientific began marketing Anatabloc one year before and CigRx two years before
anatabine’s June 2012 authorization as an IND. According to FDA’s warning
letter, however, because anatabine is considered a new dietary ingredient (NDI),
and Star Scientific had failed to comply with legal requirements to provide the
FDA notice within 75 days prior to introducing Anatabloc into the US market as
an NDI, the marketing of anatabine prior to the IND authorization was not
lawful. Therefore, anatabine was not “marketed” as a dietary supplement before
it obtained status as a “drug” under the relevant provision of federal law
(i.e., 21 USC§ 321(ff)(3)(B)(ii)). Therefore, according to the FDA, the
company’s failure to file an NDI notification (NDIN) for the compound — before it
sought to study anatabine as a new drug — disqualifies it from the definition
of dietary supplement and precludes its marketing as a dietary supplement.1
In
June 2014, Star Scientific submitted an NDI notification for anatabine in an
attempt to address this issue, qualifying its decision in the August SEC report:
“Although the company does not believe that an NDIN is a prerequisite to the
lawful marketing of the nutritional supplement,” the company explains, “the
NDIN was voluntarily submitted to provide the FDA with preclinical and clinical
data concerning the supplement.”6
Presence
in Food & Origin of Anatabine
Unlike
the above example of DMAA (1,3-dimethylamylamine),
which has yet to be definitively proven to exist naturally in botanicals,24
anatabine is known to be present in small quantities in certain plants such as
tobacco, tomatoes, potatoes, and eggplant.1,12,13 However, this
evidence does not automatically qualify anatabine as a so-called old dietary
ingredient, i.e., the term frequently used to refer to an ingredient marketed
prior to October 15, 1994, when the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act
of 1994 was passed by Congress.
“[T]he
mere presence of anatabine in such foods, without any evidence the foods were
promoted for their anatabine content,” the FDA states in the warning letter, “does
not constitute ‘marketing’ of anatabine as a food under section 201(ff)(3)(B).”1
Although
the FDA did not go into detail about the natural or synthetic derivation of
anatabine in Star Scientific’s supplements, several publicly available
documents suggest a possible synthetic origin. In the frequently asked
questions section of archived version of www.anatabloc.com — under the question
heading “Does Anatabloc® contain Tobacco?” — the company states “Although we
first looked at the anatabine alkaloid in tobacco plants, the anatabine in
Anatabloc is not derived from tobacco.”25
On
March 23, 2010, Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals — formerly the name of a subsidiary
of Star Scientific, and, as of June 2, 2014, the company’s official new name — filed
a patent titled “Methods of synthesizing anatabine.” According to the document,
“The present invention relates to improved
methods of synthesizing anatabine, especially methods that are useful in larger
scale syntheses.”22
McDonnell, who has claimed that his support of
Anatabloc was part of his job as governor to promote Virginia businesses,
apparently became aware of the compound’s synthetic origin. “It
was only later that McDonnell learned, he said [in his court testimony on
August 22, 2014], that Star synthesized anatabine out of state instead of
drawing it from tobacco leaves.”26
Tobacco
Exclusion
Perhaps
the most straightforward reason why FDA claims Anatabloc is not a legal dietary
supplement is because anatabine is found in — and can be derived from — the
tobacco plant. “[I]t appears that anatabine can be manufactured from tobacco,”
the FDA observes in its warning letter.1 “It is important to note that
tobacco, including its constituents, is excluded from the definition of ‘dietary
supplement’ under section 201(ff)(1) of the Act.” The FDA is referring to the
fact that in the definition of “dietary supplement,” the Act states that it can
be an “herb” or “botanical” product “other than tobacco” (see Table 2).
Conclusion
In
his 23 years as the head of Star Scientific, Williams oversaw the company’s
transition from a cigarette manufacturer to an innovative dietary supplement
business. However, in just the past year, new legal, regulatory, and financial
issues have put the company in a state of flux once again.
The
tone of Rock Creek Pharmaceutical’s most recent SEC quarterly report is, at
times, decidedly somber. “Since the introduction of Anatabloc®, the
Company’s revenues have been derived almost exclusively from the sale of this
product. Future sales of the Company’s dietary supplements will be dependent on
it resolving issues with the [FDA] relating to the status of its Anatabloc® and
CigRx® products,” the report states.10 “In the long
term, the Company expects that its revenues will shift to be more dependent on
the ability to successfully implement its drug development program, but it has
no drug products in advance development as of this date.”
After the McDonnell’s roughly six-week federal trial — “the biggest trial
in Virginia political history”27 — it took
the jurors less than two days to render a verdict. Pending an appeal, Bob
McDonnell could face up to 10 years in prison for his corrupt dealings with
Williams.28 It remains to be seen what impact, if any, the case
will have on the future of Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals and Anatabloc.
—Tyler
Smith
References
1.
Star Scientific, Inc. 12/30/13. Warning letter. US Food and Drug Administration
website. Available here.
Accessed August 29, 2014.
2.
Anatabloc: 300ct original bottle. Anatabloc website. Available here. Accessed
September 2, 2014.
3.
Green F. Former Star Scientific CEO Williams lands immunity. July 12, 2014. Richmond Times-Dispatch. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
4.
United States of America v. Robert F. McDonnell (Counts 1-13) and Maureen G.
McDonnell (Counts 1-11, 13-14), defendants. Indictment. January 21, 2014.
Available here.
Accessed August 26, 2014.
5.
Zapotosky M, Weiner R. Judge sets July trial for former Va. governor McDonnell.
January 24, 2014. Washington Post. Available
here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
6.
Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Quarterly
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014. Securities and Exchange
Commission website. Available here. Accessed September
3, 2014.
7.
Gabriel T. Virginians, surprised by ex-governor’s conviction, ponder the fallout.
September 6, 2014. New York Times.
Available here.
Accessed September 6, 2014.
8.
Helderman RS, Vozzella L. Jonnie R. Williams, key witness against McDonnells,
has a complicated past. February 3, 2014. Washington
Post. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
9.
Moomaw G. Star Scientific CEO has a long history of salesmanship. April 7,
2013. Richmond Times-Dispatch.
Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
10.
Blackwell JR. Star Scientific’s next controversy? Dietary aids. April 14, 2013.
Richmond Times-Dispatch. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
11.
Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Annual report
pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2012. Securities and Exchange Commission
website. Available here.
Accessed
September 3, 2014.
12.
Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. EP 2751091
A2:
Products
for anti-inflammation support. Filed July 12, 2012. Available here. Accessed August
26, 2014.
13.
Anatabine. Dr. Duke’s Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases. August 18,
2014. Available here. Accessed
September 2, 2014.
14.
How it works. CigRx website. Available here. Accessed
September 2, 2014.
15.
Anatabloc Rare Cellular Facial Crème. Anatabloc website. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
16.
Glueck K. Bob McDonnell testifies on marriage woes. August 20, 2014. Politico.
Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
17.
Vasiliadis J. Defense rests in
trial of former Virginia governor. August 27, 2014. USA Today. Available here.
Accessed
September 2, 2014.
18.
The five weirdest revelations from the McDonell trial. August 21, 2014. Daily
Beast. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
19.
Jenkins NDM, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, et al. The effects of anatabine on
non-invasive indicators of muscle damage: a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, crossover study [published online July 22, 2013]. Journal of the International Society of
Sports Nutrition. 2013;10:33. Available here. Accessed September 8,
2014.
20.
Schmeltz LR, Blevins TC, Aronoff SL, et al. Anatabine supplementation decreases
thyroglobulin antibodies in patients with chronic lymphocytic autoimmune
(Hashimoto’s) thyroiditis: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2014;99(1).
Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
21.
Hashimoto’s disease. Mayo Clinic website. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
22.
Drug development and review definitions. US Food and Drug Administration
website. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
23.
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. US Food and Drug Administration website.
Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
24.
Smith T. New research supports synthetic origin of DMAA in supplements. HerbalGram. 95;46-49. Available here. Accessed September 3, 2014.
25.
Frequently asked questions about Anatabloc®. Anatabloc website. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
26.
Rock Creek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. US Patent 8,207346 B2: Methods of synthesizing
anatabine. Filed March 23, 2010. Available here.
Accessed August 26, 2014.
27.
Fain T. McDonnell trial: Former governor sees coincidence, not conspiracy in
government’s case. August 22, 2014. Daily
Press. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014.
28. Vozzella L. Outcome of McDonnell corruption
trial may hinge on couple’s alleged marital woes. September 1, 2014. Washington Post. Available here.
Accessed September 2, 2014. |