Recently,
I was making a house call. The family of a hospice patient with metastatic lung
cancer asked me about using marijuana (Cannabis
spp., Cannabaceae) as part of her plan to manage her pain, anorexia, nausea,
weight loss, depression, and sleep problems. I discussed with them some of the
work of Donald Abrams, MD, at the University of California – San Francisco. His
meticulous research on medical marijuana over the past 10-plus years helps us
sort out these kinds of questions. Abrams, an oncologist and HIV specialist,
has been funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which provides him
with officially-approved, though low-potency, cannabis herbal preparations.
In
his research, he uses a “Volcano Vaporizer,” which heats and vaporizes the
dried herb rather than combusting it, as is the case with the typical marijuana
cigarette, joint, pipe, or reefer. This avoids the delivery of carbon monoxide
and various potentially toxic chemicals and ash that can irritate the airways.
Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), one of the main active compounds in cannabis, is
detected in the blood within about two-and-a-half minutes after using the
vaporizer. Abrams prefers this delivery system. It is superior to ingesting marijuana
— for example, in muffins, brownies, or cookies — since absorption through ingestion
is slower, less predictable, and based on a variety of factors, such as gut
motility, other food in the stomach, stomach pH, etc. THC levels don’t increase
until at least a couple of hours after consumption. This delayed effect may
lead to patients’ ingesting more than and overdosing, leading to excess
sedation for a day or more.
It
turns out, in both human and animal models, that the cannabinoids in marijuana
(e.g., THC and cannabidiol [CBD]) offer a broad spectrum of benefits,
especially for cancer patients. Cannabinoids are the psychoactive or
somatically active chemicals that give marijuana its clinical effects. The
human body has natural cannabinoid receptors; there are even endogenous
cannabinoids in the breast milk of women who are not using marijuana. No wonder
nursing infants seem so happy!
Marijuana
has multiple effects on the symptoms commonly experienced by cancer patients:
insomnia, lack of appetite, anxiety and depression, pain, neuropathy, and
nausea. While there is a genomic variability in response, with some people quickly
reacting neuropsychologically (i.e., “getting stoned”) and others getting anxious
or even paranoid, it turns out that marijuana is pharmacologically very safe
with little or no potential for overdose — even with high doses. Deaths from
cannabis overdose are extremely rare and are usually due to behavioral choices
rather than physiological effects on essential organ function. Remember the
famous redneck joke, “Hey, watch this!” You get the picture.
On
the other hand, most cancer drugs, painkillers, and many other prescription
medicines are lethal at high doses. A recent article reported that hydrocodone
products for pain are the number one prescription drug paid for by Medicare.2
They are prescribed mostly by primary care doctors, despite the risk of
addiction, and there are thousands of deaths annually due to prescription opiate
overdose — roughly 50 deaths a day. This lethality is not seen with marijuana.
Though there is a large margin of physiological safety, marijuana should not be
consumed before driving or doing other potentially hazardous things, since it
can affect reaction time, driving skills, and impair judgment and memory.
Medical
marijuana has been legal in California for more than 18 years, and the state’s
patient and physician population have accumulated a significant amount of
clinical experience and street smarts with different species, delivery systems,
and dosing. Physicians can legally counsel their cancer or chronic pain
patients on whether or not marijuana should be part of their treatment plan,
and, if so, they can write a prescription. However, medical marijuana is not
for everyone. Those with a strong personal or genetic tendency to addiction, or
certain mental problems, such as paranoia or excess anxiety, for example, would
not be optimal candidates, except perhaps in those who are terminally ill.
There
is widely voiced opposition to liberalizing the rules against marijuana
cultivation, distribution, and possession. Abrams believes our society suffers
from “euphorophobia,” a deep suspicion or distrust of any substance that makes
us feel happy. However, in a population of cancer patients, a little happiness
is not a bad thing.
So,
while the legal and moral debates on the wisdom of legalizing medical marijuana
rage on, some cancer patients are benefitting from Abrams’ and others’ careful
research on medical marijuana’s pharmacodynamics, safety, and clinical effects.
Marijuana
is now legal in 23 states and the District of Columbia for medical purposes and
in four states for recreational purposes. Still, state-approved medical
marijuana use is in a legal morass since it is illegal under federal law.
Oklahoma and Nebraska have even tried to sue Colorado over residents who are
buying legal pot in the “Rocky Mountain High” state and carrying it back across
state borders into the lowlands. The two states filed the lawsuit directly with
the Supreme Court, but in late March 2016, the justices declined to hear the
case.
If
you are a physician in Texas, it is not yet legal to prescribe medical
marijuana.* I told my hospice patient this, and I warned that she needed to be
careful about her source of marijuana if she and her family decided to use it
medicinally. Street sources may be laced with other drugs that can have serious
adverse side effects. This is one reason that controlled, licensed medical
marijuana dispensaries have arisen in other states. The family told me that it
would not be a problem, as they had a reliable source of quality organic weed
who could supply all that they needed.
As
I left from my house call, walking past the cancer patient’s family members who
were smoking cigarettes in the driveway, I scratched my head over this legal
and ethical paradox. Here she was, dying from the adverse effects of a legal
drug, tobacco, which she had used for more than 60 years, but she could not
legally get a palliative botanical medicine.
She
died less than two weeks later. I am not sure if her hospice care team knew
about the marijuana question, or even if she ultimately used it. It made me
wonder though, if lawmakers might rethink the question of legalization here in
the Lone Star state for medical and compassionate care purposes — particularly
in advanced cancer patients.
*
In June 2015, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law Senate Bill 229, the
Texas Compassionate Use Act, which will allow for the medicinal use of “low-THC
cannabis” by patients with intractable epilepsy. The Texas Department of Public
Safety is expected to start licensing dispensaries in June 2017.3
Victor
Sierpina, MD, is the director of
medical student education at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in
Galveston, Texas. He is also the UTMB Distinguished Teaching Professor W.D. and
the Laura Nell Nicholson Family Professor in Integrative Medicine. Sierpina is
a member of the ABC Advisory Board.
References
- Sierpina
V. Medical marijuana in cancer patients. Houston
Med J. 2015;12(3):6,14. Available at: www.joomag.com/magazine/medical-journal-houston/0770269001439307740?page=6. Accessed March 1,
2016.
- Silverman E. The most widely prescribed Medicare Part D drug was… generic
Vicodin. Wall Street Journal. May 4,
2015. Available at: http://blogs.wsj.com/pharmalot/2015/05/04/the-most-widely-prescribed-medicare-part-d-drug-was-generic-vicodin/. Accessed March 9, 2016.
Compassionate Use Program. Texas Department of Public Safety website. Available
at: www.txdps.state.tx.us/rsd/CUP/index.htm. Accessed March 3,
2016.
|